<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The art of Information Engineering &#187; Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grok.in/blog/cats/tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grok.in</link>
	<description>(ignorance killed the cat, curiosity was framed)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OpenDNS: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/17/opendns-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/17/opendns-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Siddhartha Reddy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/17/opendns-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenDNS is a free alternative to the DNS resolution service that your ISP provides you.
Update: OpenDNS has recently added an option to turn off the &#8220;ugly&#8221; proxying I describe below. See David Ulevitch&#8217;s comment below.
The Good:
OpenDNS is fast and reliable, more than the service offered by any ISP I have used. In addition, it offers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="OpenDNS" href="http://www.opendns.com/">OpenDNS</a> is a free alternative to the DNS resolution service that your ISP provides you.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> OpenDNS has recently added an option to turn off the &#8220;ugly&#8221; proxying I describe below. See <a href="#comment-273">David Ulevitch&#8217;s comment</a> below.</p>
<p><strong>The Good:</strong></p>
<p>OpenDNS is fast and reliable, more than the service offered by any ISP I have used. In addition, it offers a host of other <a title="OpenDNS features" href="http://www.opendns.com/features/overview/">features</a>: Content Filtering, Phishing Protection, Domain Blocking, Adult Site Blocking, Web Proxy Blocking, Domain Whitelisting, Statistics, Typo Correction, Web Shortcuts.</p>
<p>I have been using OpenDNS for well over an year now although I hardly use any of the advanced features they offer. It&#8217;s worked out quite well.</p>
<p><span id="more-32"></span><strong>The Bad:</strong></p>
<p>When you type in a domain that does not exist, OpenDNS resolves it to it&#8217;s own servers and shows search results (powered by Yahoo!) that they hope will help you find the site you were looking for. This is how they make money.</p>
<p>Now, from a DNS perspective, a bare word is a domain that does not exist. So when you <a title="Get lucky, navigate with Firefox and Google" href="http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/09/get-lucky-navigate-with-firefox-and-google/">use the Firefox address bar to navigate</a> using Google&#8217;s I&#8217;m Feeling Lucky, it is treated as a DNS lookup for a non-existent domain and instead of getting lucky, you end up on the OpenDNS SERP. For someone like me, who depends on his Google luck for regular browsing, this can be quite an annoyance. Worse, this is one of the few features in OpenDNS that cannot be turned off.</p>
<p>But just when I thought I had to give a pass to OpenDNS, I found a very simple way to get rid of this annoyance: in Firefox&#8217;s config (type <em>about:config</em> in the address bar), modify the <em>keyword.URL</em> property in any way (say, remove <em>ie=UTF-8&amp;</em> from it.) That&#8217;s all, you will once again start getting lucky!</p>
<p><strong>The Ugly:</strong></p>
<p>When I discovered that changing Firefox&#8217;s <em>keyword.URL</em> property fixes the above bad, it got me wondering: how come?</p>
<p>A little investigation turned threw some light: OpenDNS resolves www.google.com to its own servers and transparently proxies through all the requests to it, except &#8212; you guessed it &#8212; the Firefox address bar searches!</p>
<p>Now this is ugly, to say the least. A little Googling found a blog post from OpenDNS in which they provide <a title="OpenDNS Blog : Google turns the page... in a bad way" href="http://blog.opendns.com/2007/05/22/google-turns-the-page/">an excuse for doing this</a>: Dell makes a special Google-Dell page as the default search engine on all the comupters it sells; the OpenDNS folks <em>feel</em> that this page has too many ads and they do not <em>like</em> it; so they decided to <em>fix</em> it. Although I do not condone Dell&#8217;s policy, I do not believe what OpenDNS is doing is right.</p>
<p>OpenDNS is not my DNS resolver any more. It was good while it lasted. If you do not have any qualms about OpenDNS hijacking the Google searches, go ahead an use this it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/17/opendns-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get lucky, navigate with Firefox and Google</title>
		<link>http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/09/get-lucky-navigate-with-firefox-and-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/09/get-lucky-navigate-with-firefox-and-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Siddhartha Reddy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/09/get-lucky-navigate-with-firefox-and-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of the searches I do every day are navigational. What this means in plain English is that I do a search to find a particular web page/site and then just navigate to it. This is in contrast to the exploratory searches where I usually end up visiting more than one of the search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the searches I do every day are <em>navigational</em>. What this means in plain English is that I do a search to find a particular web page/site and then just navigate to it. This is in contrast to the exploratory searches where I usually end up visiting more than one of the search results. Navigational search does not imply that I know beforehand which page to go to, it might be that I had a hunch such a page would exist or I discover that from the search results. Some examples of the former are when I want to navigate to the page that discusses a particular topic on Wikipedia or a the page of particular movie/actor on IMDB; the later happens when I find such pages in the search results. Because of a couple of beautiful features in Firefox and Google, I end up not seeing the search result pages at all for most of the navigational searches.</p>
<p><span id="more-27"></span>In Firefox, if you type in any text in the address bar which is not a valid URL, it defaults to a search for that text on Google. Even better, it defaults to the &#8220;I&#8217;m Feeling Lucky&#8221; search on Google. So if there is one particular page which seems to fit the search very well, you are directly taken to it instead of being shown the search results. If no such page exists, regular Google search results are shown. I have noted that not many people use this very useful feature, not even the highly technical inclined. So I thought it would be a good idea to record this here.</p>
<p>Here are some examples of good navigational queries (type in Firefox address bar, without the quotes):</p>
<p>&#8220;imdb the godfather&#8221; or even just &#8220;the godfather&#8221;!</p>
<p>&#8220;wikipedia grok&#8221; or &#8220;wiki grok&#8221; or even just &#8220;grok&#8221;!</p>
<p>&#8220;bob dylan last.fm&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;lyrics stairway to heaven&#8221;</p>
<p>If you feel that &#8220;I&#8217;m Feeling Lucky&#8221; is too aggressive, you might want to switch to Google&#8217;s &#8220;Browse By Name&#8221; or even the regular Google search from the Firefox address bar. <a title="Googleâ€™s â€œBrowse By Nameâ€ in Firefox" href="http://www.squarefree.com/2004/09/09/googles-browse-by-name-in-firefox/">This page</a> explains the how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grok.in/blog/2008/03/09/get-lucky-navigate-with-firefox-and-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
